Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2026 (English)In: Energy, Ecology and Environment, ISSN 2363-7692, E-ISSN 2363-8338, Vol. 11, no 2, p. 233-252Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Integrating CO2 capture into combined heat and power (CHP) plants reduces heat and electricity generation. Heat pumps (HPs) can be utilized to recover waste heat for solvent regeneration or district heating (DH). However, no study compares different ways of utilizing recovered heat. Therefore, this study evaluated the performance of a HP-integrated CHP plant with CO2 capture. Four cases were considered, Case 1 (reference case 1): without CO2 capture; Case 2 (reference case 2): with CO2 capture and no HPs; Case 3: with CO2 capture and using HPs to recover heat for DH; and Case 4: with CO2 capture and using HPs to recover heat for solvent regeneration. Using real operating data from a waste-fired CHP plant (50 MWe, 110 MWth), results demonstrated that, in Case 2 (cf. Case 1), maximum 81.6% of CO2 was captured at a cost of 62.6% reduction in net electricity generation. In Case 3, 45.3% of the DH demand was covered by HP recovered heat, amounting 375.8 GWh/year. In Case 4, 78.3% of the heat required for CO2 capture was supplied by HP recovered heat, reaching 445.1 GWh/year. While 90% of CO2 was captured in Cases 3 and 4, the annual net electricity generation was reduced by 64.5% and 37.1%, respectively. Additionally, given current carbon trading prices, CO2 capture was not economically feasible and that system's internal heat recovery by HPs is not economically feasible, either.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2026
Keywords
Waste-fired combined heat and power plant, MEA-based chemical absorption, Waste heat recovery, Heat pumps, Operation optimization
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-73943 (URN)10.1007/s40974-025-00384-6 (DOI)001574868400001 ()2-s2.0-105016727263 (Scopus ID)
2025-11-032025-11-032026-06-10Bibliographically approved