https://www.mdu.se/

Transition-oriented debt finance has expanded rapidly alongside growing expectations that financial actors will contribute to low-carbon transitions. Yet it remains uncertain whether such financing practices translate into meaningful impacts at the sectoral level. A central difficulty is analytical: when a low-carbon intervention is embedded over time, impacts on sectoral transition cannot be inferred from the scale of embedding, the presence of recognizable change, or compliance with criteria and reporting routines. This licentiate thesis develops and applies an analytically grounded approach for retrospective assessment of sectoral low-carbon transition impacts. It then interprets what the assessments imply about how the embedding of transition debt finance relates to sectoral low-carbon transitions. The approach addresses two analytically distinct types of impact: emission goal alignment of innovation and the acceleration of transformative low-carbon processes. Assessments consider the extent, low-carbon scope, and depth of linked innovation and process change relative to explicit reference points. The approach is applied to the embedding of transition-oriented debt finance in the Swedish commercial real estate sector from 2014 to 2021, an extreme case in which discernible impacts would be comparatively likely. The study adopts a critical realist–inspired research design and conducts a qualitative, retrospective sectoral case study drawing on documents, focus groups and interviews, and structured procedures for analytical linking and assessments. In this case, sectoral low-carbon transition impacts are interpreted as constrained: emission goal alignment is limited in the operations value chain and absent in the construction value chain, while acceleration of transformative low-carbon processes remains limited overall. This shows that extensive embedding of transition debt finance does not guarantee strong sectoral low-carbon transition impacts, even under favorable conditions for discernible impacts. Eligibility and reporting emphasized operations and standardized credentials, while construction and embodied-emission hotspots were less consistently targeted. By developing and applying an assessment approach focused on alignment and acceleration, the thesis advances a sector-level transition impact framing and provides a structured way to assess those impact types against explicit reference points, while treating credentialing as analytically central.