https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can STPA be used for a System-of-Systems? Experiences from an Automated Quarry Site
Volvo Construction Equipment, Eskilstuna, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4756-7285
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems. RISE ICT/SICS Västerås, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8891-033X
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5269-3900
2018 (English)In: 4th IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, ISSE 2018 - Proceedings, 2018, no 4, article id 8544433Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Automation is becoming prevalent in more and more industrial domains due to the potential benefits in cost reduction as well as the new approaches/solutions they enable. When machines are automated and utilized in system-of-systems, a thorough analysis of potential critical scenarios is necessary to derive appropriate design solutions that are safe as well. Hazard analysis methods like PHA, FTA or FMEA help to identify and follow up potential risks for the machine operators or bystanders and are well-established in the development process for safety critical machinery. However, safety certified individual machines can no way guarantee safety in the context of system-of-systems since their integration and interactions could bring forth newer hazards. Hence it is paramount to understand the application sce- narios of the system-of-systems and to apply a structured method to identify all potential hazards. In this paper, we 1) provide an overview of proposed hazard analysis methods for system-of- systems, 2) describe a case from construction equipment domain, and 3) apply the well-known System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA)f to our case. Our experiences during the case study and the analysis of results clearly point out certain inadequacies of STPA in the context of system-of-systems and underlines the need for the development of improved techniques for safety analysis of system-of-systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. no 4, article id 8544433
Keywords [en]
Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment, System- of-Systems, Autonomous Machines, STPA, Safety
National Category
Engineering and Technology Computer Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-41719DOI: 10.1109/SysEng.2018.8544433ISI: 000469921000047Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85059989681OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-41719DiVA, id: diva2:1273499
Conference
4th IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering, ISSE 2018; Rome Marriott Park HotelRoma; Italy; 1 October 2018 through 3 October 2018; Category numberCFP18SYM-ART; Code 143143
Projects
ITS-EASY Post Graduate School for Embedded Software and SystemsAvailable from: 2018-12-21 Created: 2018-12-21 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Safety Analysis of Systems-of-Systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Safety Analysis of Systems-of-Systems
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Safety-critical systems may fail dangerously with severe consequences to the health of the involved humans, costly equipment, the environment, or other valuable assets of a stakeholder. For these classes of systems, the developers are obliged to analyze each potentially hazardous situation thoroughly. In addition, any identified hazardous situation needs to be considered for risk reduction measures, including adjustments of the system's design, additional safeguards if the hazards cannot entirely be removed by design, or warning information to users.  

An essential activity in the development process is the safety analysis, where hazards related to the system under development are identified, and the risks are evaluated and classified. This classification stipulates the rigor of complying with safety standard requirements and directing the development and verification activities. Several techniques for safety analysis have been identified in the literature and are applied in industrial development processes.

The technical evolution enables moving from developing single systems with specific features towards attaching several independent systems to a system-of-systems.On top of the trend towards connectedness, there is also a trend towards more and more automation. In the vehicle domain, autonomous vehicles can collaborate to achieve specific goals, like transporting goods in warehouses, transporting containers in automated ports, or transporting material in off-road environments.

Autonomy brings in new challenges when ensuring product safety and functional safety for single systems due to the lack of a human operator as a fallback solution.Further, when autonomous vehicles collaborate in a fleet, the safety analysis becomes more complex since their interaction and interoperability bring forth new hazards not identifiable with a safety analysis of a single system. Our research aims to bridge this gap and provide solutions for specifying a system-of-systems and finding and developing suitable safety analysis methods.

To understand the challenges and current practices, we have studied industrial projects where systems-of-systems are developed. We have applied safety analysis methods to our industrial cases and found limitations of finding hazards related to a system-of-systems. As part of our research, we have developed extensions to the safety analysis methods to support the analysis of a system-of-systems. We have developed the Safe System-of-Systems (SafeSoS) method which is a structured and hierarchical process to discover and document a system-of-systems characteristics on three primary abstraction levels. Additionally, we utilize model-based formalism to describe the System-of-Systems’ characteristics on each level. Our research results support engineers in the industry when designing a safety-critical system-of-systems.

Abstract [sv]

Safety-critical systems may fail dangerously with severe consequences to the health of the involved humans, costly equipment, the environment, or other valuable assets of a stakeholder. For these classes of systems, the developers are obliged to analyze each potentially hazardous situation thoroughly. In addition, any identified hazardous situation needs to be considered for risk reduction measures, including adjustments of the system's design, additional safeguards if the hazards cannot entirely be removed by design, or warning information to users.  An essential activity in the development process is the safety analysis, where hazards related to the system under development are identified, and the risks are evaluated and classified. This classification stipulates the rigor of complying with safety standard requirements and directing the development and verification activities. Several techniques for safety analysis have been identified in the literature and are applied in industrial development processes.The technical evolution enables moving from developing single systems with specific features towards attaching several independent systems to a system-of-systems.On top of the trend towards connectedness, there is also a trend towards more and more automation. In the vehicle domain, autonomous vehicles can collaborate to achieve specific goals, like transporting goods in warehouses, transporting containers in automated ports, or transporting material in off-road environments.Autonomy brings in new challenges when ensuring product safety and functional safety for single systems due to the lack of a human operator as a fallback solution.Further, when autonomous vehicles collaborate in a fleet, the safety analysis becomes more complex since their interaction and interoperability bring forth new hazards not identifiable with a safety analysis of a single system. Our research aims to bridge this gap and provide solutions for specifying a system-of-systems and finding and developing suitable safety analysis methods.To understand the challenges and current practices, we have studied industrial projects where systems-of-systems are developed. We have applied safety analysis methods to our industrial cases and found limitations of finding hazards related to a system-of-systems. As part of our research, we have developed extensions to the safety analysis methods to support the analysis of a system-of-systems. We have developed the Safe System-of-Systems (SafeSoS) method which is a structured and hierarchical process to discover and document a system-of-systems characteristics on three primary abstraction levels. Additionally, we utilize model-based formalism to describe the System-of-Systems’ characteristics on each level. Our research results support engineers in the industry when designing a safety-critical system-of-systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Västerås: Mälardalen University, 2022
Series
Mälardalen University Press Dissertations, ISSN 1651-4238 ; 355
Keywords
System-of-Systems, Safety Analysis, Hazard Analysis, Model-based Development
National Category
Computer Systems
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-56680 (URN)978-91-7485-542-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-01-14, Zeta (och Zoom), Mälardalens högskola, Västerås, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-12-06 Created: 2021-12-04 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fröberg, JoakimPunnekkat, Sasikumar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baumgart, StephanFröberg, JoakimPunnekkat, Sasikumar
By organisation
Embedded Systems
Engineering and TechnologyComputer Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 691 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf