https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of dynamic bayesian models for gas turbine diagnostics, part 2: Discrimination of gradual degradation and rapid faults
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6101-2863
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8466-356X
2021 (English)In: Machines, E-ISSN 2075-1702, Vol. 9, no 12, article id 308Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There are many challenges that an effective diagnostic system must overcome for successful fault diagnosis in gas turbines. Among others, it has to be robust to engine-to-engine variations in the fleet, it has to discriminate between gradual deterioration and abrupt faults, and it has to identify sensor faults correctly and be robust in case of such faults. To combine their benefits and overcome their limitations, two diagnostic methods were integrated in this work to form a multi-layer system. An adaptive performance model was used to track gradual deterioration and detect rapid or abrupt anomalies, while a series of static and dynamic Bayesian networks were integrated to identify component degradation, component abrupt faults, and sensor faults. The proposed approach was tested on synthetic data and field data from a single-shaft gas turbine of 50 MW class. The results showed that the approach could give acceptable accuracy in the isolation and identification of multiple faults, with 99% detection and isolation accuracy and 1% maximum error in the identified fault magnitude. The approach was also proven robust to sensor faults, by replacing the faulty signal with an estimated value that had only 3% error compared to the real measurement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI , 2021. Vol. 9, no 12, article id 308
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-56733DOI: 10.3390/machines9120308ISI: 000737900000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120705084OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-56733DiVA, id: diva2:1619935
Available from: 2021-12-14 Created: 2021-12-14 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Zaccaria, ValentinaFentaye, Amare DesalegnKyprianidis, Konstantinos

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zaccaria, ValentinaFentaye, Amare DesalegnKyprianidis, Konstantinos
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Machines
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf