https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Concepts and Relationships in Safety and Security Ontologies: A Comparative Study
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7986-2214
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0757-822X
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Embedded Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0904-3712
2022 (English)In: 2022 6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety, ICSRS 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2022, p. 357-364Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Safety and security ontologies quickly become essential support for integrating heterogeneous knowledge from various sources. Today, there is little standardization of ontologies and almost no discussion of how to compare concepts and their relationships, establish a general approach to create relationships or model them in general. However, concepts with similar names are not semantically similar or compatible in some cases. In this case, the problem of correspondence arises among the concepts and relationships found in the ontologies. To solve this problem, a comparison between the Hazard Ontology (HO) and the Combined Security Ontology (CSO) is proposed, in which the value of equivalence between their concepts and their relationships was extracted and analyzed. Although the HO covers the concepts related to the safety domain and the CSO includes securityrelated concepts, both are based on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). For this study, HO and CSO were compared, and the results were summarized in the form of comparison tables. Our main contribution involves the comparisons among the concepts in HO and CSO to identify equivalences and differences between the two. Due to the increasing number of ontologies, their mapping, merging, and alignment are primary challenges in bridging the gaps that exist between the safety and security domains. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. , 2022. p. 357-364
Keywords [en]
Combined Security Ontology, comparison, concepts, Hazard Ontology, relationships, safety, security, Hazards, Comparatives studies, Concept, Ontology's, Relationship, Safety and securities, Security ontologies, Ontology
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-62283DOI: 10.1109/ICSRS56243.2022.10067740ISI: 000981836500052Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85151690593ISBN: 9781665470926 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-62283DiVA, id: diva2:1751704
Conference
6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety, ICSRS 2022, Venice, 23 November 2022 through 25 November 2022
Available from: 2023-04-19 Created: 2023-04-19 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. An Ontological Approach for Hazard and Threat Analysis in Cyber-Physical Systems of Systems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>An Ontological Approach for Hazard and Threat Analysis in Cyber-Physical Systems of Systems
2025 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

As society moves toward greater interconnectedness, the complexity and interdependence of systems-of-systems (SoSs) increase, giving rise to multifaceted safety hazards and security threats. The critical need for effective hazard and threat analysis within SoSs is addressed in this licentiate thesis by focusing on the development and application of specialized ontologies. The interconnected nature of safety and security is highlighted, and a novel ontological framework that integrates these aspects into a unified analysis tool is proposed. The research was organized around five main contributions:

- The application of a Hazard Ontology (HO) to a cyber-physical SoS at a quarry site equipped with autonomous vehicles, enabling the identification of hazard sources, causes, and consequences.

- Through a systematic literature review of security ontologies, essential security concepts and their relationships were identified. These concepts were harmonized with established security standards, such as NIST SP 800-160 and ISO/IEC 27001.

- The development of a Combined Security Ontology (CSO), based on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO), by synthesizing security concepts derived from the literature review and mapping them to a foundational safety ontology to bridge the gap between the security and safety domains.

- A comparative analysis of the HO and the CSO was conducted, highlighting similarities and differences in concepts and relationships, and clarifying the integration challenges and opportunities between safety and security ontologies.

- The proposed Hazard and Threat Ontology (HTO) extends the HO and integrates elements from the CSO, facilitating simultaneous analysis of hazard and threat within SoSs.

The thesis emphasizes the need for evolving ontological methods to enhance hazard and threat analyses in SoSs, ensuring their adaptability to dynamic operational environments and emerging challenges. With this integrated approach, the thesis aims to contribute to the safety and security domains within systems engineering by providing a methodological framework that is both innovative and applicable to real-world scenarios. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Västerås: Mälardalen University, 2025. p. 190
Series
Mälardalen University Press Licentiate Theses, ISSN 1651-9256 ; 377
Keywords
Systems-of-Systems; hazard analysis; threat analysis; safety; security; ontology; Hazard Ontology; Combined Security Ontology; Hazard and Threat Ontology; ontological integration; cyber-physical systems; autonomous vehicles; security standards; NIST SP 800-160; ISO/IEC 27001; Unified Foundational Ontology; systems engineering
National Category
Embedded Systems Computer Systems
Research subject
Computer Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-72982 (URN)978-91-7485-714-6 (ISBN)
Presentation
2025-10-10, Gamma, Mälardalens universitet, Västerås, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-08-18 Created: 2025-08-13 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Adach, MalinaHänninen, KajLundqvist, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Adach, MalinaHänninen, KajLundqvist, Kristina
By organisation
Embedded Systems
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf