https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing a machine learning model for heat pipes considering different input features
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Key Lab Refrigerat Technol Tianjin, Tianjin, Peoples R China..
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Key Lab Refrigerat Technol Tianjin, Tianjin, Peoples R China..
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.
Tianjin Univ Commerce, Key Lab Refrigerat Technol Tianjin, Tianjin, Peoples R China..
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: International journal of thermal sciences, ISSN 1290-0729, E-ISSN 1778-4166, Vol. 208, article id 109398Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Using heat pipes (HPs) is an effective method for heat dissipation to overcome the challenge about the rising power density of the permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM). Using machine learning models to evaluate the performance of HPs has attracted much attention. There are many key input features that can affect the performance of machine learning models, which impacts, whereas, have not been understood, and how to select such features still remains unclear. In this work, the impact of thirteen key input features is investigated by using the Shapely value. Results showed that, when only predicting the effective thermal conductivity (Keff), heat flux (Q), ratio of HP length to diameter (F), ratio of evaporator length to HP length (e), ratio of condenser length to HP length (c), ratio of HP length to cross area (I), effective length of HP (Leff), inclination angle (B), and Nusselt number (Nu) should be considered when using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. Based on such input features, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination (R2) are 5.68 % and 0.9580, respectively. When predicting critical heat flux (Qcr) and (Keff), the model accuracy is lower, with 6.81 % of MAPE and 0.9377 of R2. The identified key input features can also provide insights on how to improve the HP design and how to renovate the development of physical models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER , 2025. Vol. 208, article id 109398
Keywords [en]
Motor cooling, Heat pipe, Performance modeling, Machine learning
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-68477DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109398ISI: 001309906400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85203152012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-68477DiVA, id: diva2:1898793
Available from: 2024-09-18 Created: 2024-09-18 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Shi, Xiaodan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shi, Xiaodan
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
International journal of thermal sciences
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf