This research paper explores machine learning techniques, such as voting regressors, gradient boosting regressors, random forest regressors, decision tree regressors, and support vector regressors, for car predicting the car price. Each machine learning technique has its own unique advantages and disadvantages, with the voting regressor exhibiting the best results. Methodologically, GridSearchCV is used to tune hyperparameters on a dataset of more than 200 automobiles, each with 26 parameters. The outcomes demonstrate the predictive power of regression and ensemble techniques, providing insightful information to practitioners in the business and academics alike. The training accuracies range from 16.87% (MAPE) for Linear Regression, 96.78% for Decision Tree Regressor, 96.49% for Random Forest Regressor, 97.84% for Gradient Boosting Regressor,95.8% for Voting Regressor, 81.89% for Support Vector Regressor, notably the testing accuracies vary from 19.44% (MAPE) for Linear Regression, 87.76% for Decision Tree Regressor, 89.75% for Random Forest Regressor, 88.67% for Gradient Boosting Regressor, 88.02% for Voting Regressor, 79.55% for Support Vector Regressor.