https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Renewable and integrated energy system resilience – A review and generic resilience index
University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Sweden.
University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Innovation and Product Realisation.ORCID iD: 0009-0002-3129-3566
University of Gävle, Kungsbäcksvägen 47, Gävle, Sweden.
2025 (English)In: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, ISSN 1364-0321, E-ISSN 1879-0690, Vol. 215, article id 115554Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Energy systems around the world are undergoing structural and contextual changes following a global increase of electricity use, higher sector integration, changing security landscape, and growing share of renewable energy. These developments are changing the dynamics of systems, questioning the resilience of future energy systems. Viewing resilience as a process of preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery, this study performs a systematic literature review over how different phases are covered in research on resilient energy systems with a focus on the integration of renewable energy. This study also reviews grey literature to assess how Sweden and the EU are attempting to build resilience. Findings show a focus on energy security originating in the western world and few studies within the reviewed papers consider and measures all phases of the resilience process. Most academic papers focus on mitigation and an underrepresentation of studies evaluating recovery capabilities. Comparatively, grey literature shows a preparedness for sudden shocks, and less for more pervasive disturbances. The novelty of the review lies in its identification of discrepancies between the stated analysis of resilience aspects and their quantification in the reviewed papers. The study also presents a novel method of quantifying resilience in an energy system by including all phases of the resilience process. This study contributes to SDG 9.a, by showcasing the lack of representation of the global South and proposing and demonstrating a generic index which supports resilient infrastructure development regardless of geography.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2025. Vol. 215, article id 115554
Keywords [en]
Adversity, Energy hubs, Energy security, Mitigation, Multi-carrier energy system, Preparedness, Recovery, Renewable energy, Resilience, Response, Sector integration, Smart energy system, Water-energy-food nexus, Carrier energy, Energy, Energy systems, Multicarriers, Renewable energies, Smart energy systems, Water energy, Clean energy
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-70413DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115554ISI: 001441821600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85219656748OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-70413DiVA, id: diva2:1944075
Available from: 2025-03-12 Created: 2025-03-12 Last updated: 2025-10-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Önnered, Simon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Önnered, Simon
By organisation
Innovation and Product Realisation
In the same journal
Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 176 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf