https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The struggle over caesarean section on maternal request: an ethical principles approach to Swedish media portrayal
Uppsala Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Hlth Serv Res, Box 564, S-75122 Uppsala, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Health and Welfare.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5566-3421
2025 (English)In: Reproductive Health, E-ISSN 1742-4755, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 118Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR) is a complex ethical issue. Sweden is an intriguing case for studying CSMR due to its restrictive policy that curtail women autonomous choice regarding the mode of birth, despite overall policy developments aiming to strengthen patients' rights, promote person-centred care, and adopt a more individualized approach. This study aims to understand how the tension surrounding CSMR is manifested in Swedish media. An ethical principles approach is used to investigate what image of CSMR is created and conveyed to the public and what main arguments are used for and against CSMR. Methods This study covers news media and specialist press material in Sweden between March 2019 and March 2024. Searches were carried out in Retriever Research and resulted in 188 search hits. The content analysis had both an inductive and a deductive approach based on Beauchamp and Childress's four ethical principles: respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Results The analysis reveals a struggle in Swedish media over how to approach CSMR, touching on all ethical principles. Regarding autonomy, the debate focuses on whether CSMR is a medical decision about non-indicated surgery or a private choice. In terms of non-maleficence-which is the health professionals' main concern-the media highlights conflicts over interpreting risks associated with caesarean section and vaginal birth. Beneficence involves a tension between portraying vaginal birth as healthy and normal versus caesarean section as a method to protect sexual and bodily function. As regards justice, CSMR is portrayed as a challenge to the fundamental needs-principle in the healthcare system. Conclusions Ultimately, the ethical principles approach to analyzing the media portrayal of CSMR in Sweden highlights the need for decision guidelines and practices that are more open to a woman's own evaluation of different risks while also encouraging critical reflection on the underlying factors shaping treatment preferences for both women and healthcare professionals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2025. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 118
Keywords [en]
Caesarean section on maternal request, Cesarean birth on maternal request, Ethical principles approach, Sweden
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-72710DOI: 10.1186/s12978-025-02057-3ISI: 001518859000002PubMedID: 40579708Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105009328507OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-72710DiVA, id: diva2:1982886
Available from: 2025-07-09 Created: 2025-07-09 Last updated: 2026-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1000 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1000 kBChecksum SHA-512
9143911dd30d6398588e5fb4824b1b302272026161bd897fb124f71e66c1fdbace23474856d3b672cdf9f14c3cabb3c8218b559b5293bbdf856513888c0fb8c2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mattebo, Magdalena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mattebo, Magdalena
By organisation
Health and Welfare
In the same journal
Reproductive Health
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf