https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unlocking the full value of battery storage: Fuse-constrained, multi-service stacking and peak shaving in a unified optimization framework
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1165-5569
CheckWatt AB, Göteborg, Sweden.
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.ORCID iD: 0009-0007-7428-6821
Mälardalen University, School of Business, Society and Engineering, Future Energy Center.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Journal of Energy Storage, ISSN 2352-152X, E-ISSN 2352-1538, Vol. 141, article id 119458Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Battery energy storage systems enhance grid flexibility by enabling participation in frequency containment reserves (FCR), day-ahead (DA), and peak shaving (PS) markets—each with distinct operational and economic rules. Yet, operators face a key challenge: how to stack services without compromising reliability or lifespan? This study presents a unified mixed-integer linear programming framework for optimal multi-service stacking, rigorously integrating technical constraints — including real-world fuse limits and battery degradation — alongside market participation requirements. Uniquely, the model balances both droop-based and energy-based FCR participation, precise day-ahead market trading, and behind-the-meter cost management, all while tracking the interplay of physical and regulatory boundaries. The framework is tested using real industrial data from Sweden, under the coordinated rules of Svenska kraftnät. Results reveal that holistic co-optimization is not just a theoretical ideal but a practical economic lever: stacking services increases net profit by about 83% compared to the single-market strategy (DA). This highlights the need for a holistic approach that manages state of energy (SoE), degradation, and fuse limits. The analysis shows that moderate relaxations in fuse limits boost revenue, but benefits plateau, suggesting that reasonable sizing captures most economic gains without costly upgrades to fuses or grid infrastructure. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 141, article id 119458
Keywords [en]
Battery energy storage systems, FCR market, Fuse limit, MILP optimization, Peak shaving, Battery management systems, Battery storage, Commerce, Constrained optimization, Cost benefit analysis, Integer linear programming, Mixed-integer linear programming, Secondary batteries, Day-ahead, Frequency containment reserve market, Multi-services, Optimisations, Peak-shaving, Reserve markets, Stackings, Digital storage
National Category
Energy Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-74555DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2025.119458ISI: 001621581000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105021475491OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-74555DiVA, id: diva2:2016662
Available from: 2025-11-26 Created: 2025-11-26 Last updated: 2025-12-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Shahroozi, ZahraSu, ChenyuMaher, AzazaLi, Hailong

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shahroozi, ZahraSu, ChenyuMaher, AzazaLi, Hailong
By organisation
Future Energy Center
In the same journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Energy Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 230 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf