https://www.mdu.se/

mdu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment by portfolio in a physiotherapy programme
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Alle 23, SE-14183 Huddinge, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Alle 23, SE-14183 Huddinge, Sweden..
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Alle 23, SE-14183 Huddinge, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4607-8677
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Physiotherapy, Alfred Nobels Alle 23, SE-14183 Huddinge, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6989-719X
2012 (English)In: European Journal of Physiotherapy, ISSN 2167-9169, E-ISSN 2167-9177, Vol. 14, no 1, p. 38-46Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the paper is to describe the introduction of a portfolio method of teaching and learning, and to describe students' perceptions of the method as well as a peer-review system in a course, in the physiotherapy programme, at the Karolinska Institutet. A further aim was to describe the level of grades over time. A modified form of a showcase portfolio method together with a three-graded assessment criteria was introduced into the course. Students, over five semesters, were included in the project (n = 287) of which 91% answered questions and statements regarding their perception of the assessment method and the peer-review system. All portfolios were graded in a scale of three: fail, pass and pass with distinction. The majority of students were satisfied and reported positive learning effects with the assessment method and review system. However, the students asked for more guidance in how to give feedback. During these five semesters, the percentage of students that passed with distinction increased and the percentage of students that failed decreased. Three years after implementing the portfolio, our impression is that the method encourages students to take a more active part in learning and leads to a deeper approach to knowledge.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD , 2012. Vol. 14, no 1, p. 38-46
Keywords [en]
academic, pedagogic, peer review, physiotherapy, scholarship
National Category
Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-74653DOI: 10.3109/14038196.2012.661458ISI: 000217396800006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-74653DiVA, id: diva2:2017078
Available from: 2025-11-27 Created: 2025-11-27 Last updated: 2026-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Fridén, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagstromer, MariaFridén, Cecilia
In the same journal
European Journal of Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf